EXPERIENCE USING MULTIMEDIA BOARDS FOR VISUALIZATION, CONDUCTING PEDAGOGICAL DISCUSSIONS, DEVELOPING INTERACTIVE EXERCISES FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL
Keywords:
multimedia board, IWB, interactive exercise, teachers` IT-competencies, teaching children with special needs, primary school teachers` methodical competenceAbstract
This article is concerning foremost studying the experience of different educators in developed and rapidly developing countries using multimedia boards for visualization science and mathematics, conducting teachers` and students` teaching discussions, develop of interactive exercises, increase the level of teachers` IT-competencies, problems of readiness to use ICT, and the formation level of professional teachers needs to use the whiteboard. The article focuses on the main scientific theories description, scientific achievements and developments in using multimedia boards in the school. By the way, author dwells on preparing future teachers for teaching science in elementary and primary school, ability to update teaching children with special needs: visually challenged, deaf student, fine motor delay, autistic, mental and behavioral challenged, psychological aspects of using IWB in teaching children with different types of perceptual information: visual, audial, kinesthetic, discrete. In conclusion author gives applicant`s scientific prognostication contribution to studying forming of primary school teachers` methodical competence.
Downloads
References
Villano, M. (2006). PICTURE THIS! T H E Journal., Vol. 33, Issue 16, 16-20.
Türel, Y. K. & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers' Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (1), 381–394.
Martin S., Shaw E., Daughenbaugh L. (2014). Using Smart Boards and Manipulatives in the Elementary Science Classroom . TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 90–96.
Kate W., Steve H., Heather S. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 851–867.
Sharon R., Chhanda I. (2011). Shared reading goes high-tech. The Reading Teacher, 224–227.
New classroom programs promote collaborative learning. (2012). Expedition. Vol. 54 Issue 1, 53-54.
Ruggieri M. (2005). Chalkboard to SMART Board - and Back. Academic Search Premier, 52-53.
Ibrahim Mohammed Al-Faki, Abdelmoneim Hassan Adams Khamis. (2014). Difficulties facing teachers in using interactive whiteboards in the classes. American International Journal of Social Science. Volume 3, No 2, 136-158.
Kiranli Semra, Yusuf Yildirim. (2013). Technology Usage Competencies of the Teachers: Prior To Faith Project Implementation. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 12, Issue 47, 88-105.
M. Josef, K. Kateřina, C. Milan. (2016). The conceptual bases for designing module "tools for adaptive learning and learning styles" within mooc course "ICT tools for e-learning". Collected Scientific Works “Open educational e-environment of modern university”, from http://openedu.kubg.edu.ua/journal/index.php/openedu/article/view/29#.WA_VLeCLTIU.
PDST Technology in Education (2014). Tablets for Learning. Dublin: Dublin City University.
SMART Technologies ULC (2009). Creating Classrooms for Everyone How Interactive Whiteboards Support Universal Design for Learning.
Preston C., Mowbray L. (2008). Use of SMART Boards for teaching, learning and assessment in kindergarten science. Teaching science. Vol 54, 51-54.
Doe C. (2010). Interactive Whiteboards. MultiMedia & Internet@Schools. Vol. 17, Issue 1, 30-34.
Edith M., Osnat D., Tal Berger T., Rachel Z. (2011). Using the Interactive White Board in Teaching and Learning – An Evaluation of the SMART CLASSROOM Pilot Project Using the Interactive White Board in Teaching and Learning – An Evaluation of the SMART CLASSROOM Pilot Project. 7, 249–273.
Armstrong V., Barnes S., Sutherland R., Curran S., Mills S. & Thompson I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology. Academic Search Premier, Educational Review, 57, 4, 457-469.