USING OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2019s19

Keywords:

digital technologies, assessment, purposes of assessment, formative assessment

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of using modern digital technologies for formative assessment. The main objectives of the assessment, such as "assessment for learning", "assessment as learning" and "assessment of learning", are analyzed, and it is stated that the first two objectives are realized precisely by means of formative assessment. The evaluation strategies that the teacher can use to collect data on student achievements is analyzed. The objectives of formative assessment before the beginning, during the process of work and at the end of the lesson are determined; as well as methods of formative assessment. The structure of the formative assessment process consisting of six steps is analyzed.  In today's conditions, for the implementation of formative assessment, it is expedient to involve digital technologies. Therefore, the article proposes a classification of digital resources that can be used for formative assessment at different stages of the occupation and for different purposes, examples are given and a description of possible use of resources of each specified category. In particular, such digital resources as quizzes, surveys, online tests, virtual boards, multiservices for creating interactive tasks with the possibility of self-checking their correctness, word-of-mouth word services, mindmaps, services for creating infographics and visualization, keeping diaries are considered. Different ways of using virtual boards for formative assessment are offered, and examples are given of their application before the beginning of the class, in the process of work and at the end of the lesson for reflection. The research leading to these results received, within the framework of the Modernization of Pedagogical Higher Education by Innovative Teaching Instruments. MoPED – KA2 CBHE – 586098-EPP-1-2017-1-UA-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nataliia Morze, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Professor, Doctor of Pedagogy, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Vice-rector on informatization of educational, scientific and management activity

Viktoriia Vember, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

PhD (pedagogical sciences), Associate Professor of the Department of Computer Science and Mathematics

Mariia Boiko, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Senior Lecturer, Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Faculty of Information Technology and Management

References

Vember, V. (2019). Implementation of BYOD technology for formative assessment. Innovative technologies in education: a collection of materials of the international scientific and technical conference, Ivano-Frankivsk, 45-47.

http://nung.edu.ua/cdn2019 (in Ukrainian).

Gurzgiy, А. & Lapinskiy, V. (2019). Electronic educational resources as the basis of the modern educational environment of general educational institutions. Information technology in education, 1, 15, 30-37 (in Ukrainian).

Lokshina, O. (2009). Innovations in assessing academic achievement of students in school education in the European Union. Comparative-pedagogical studios, 2, 107-113 (in Ukrainian).

Logvina, I. & Rozgdestvenskaya, L. (2012) Formative assessment tools in the activity of the subject teacher. Teacher’s Guide. Narva (in Ukrainian).

Morze N., Barna O. & Vember V. (2013). Formative Assessment: From Theory to Practice. Informatics and Information Technologies in Educational Institutions, 6, 45-57 (in Ukrainian).

Spirin, O. (2010). Іnformation and communications technology training: criteria for internal quality assessment. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, Vol.19, №5. http://lib.iitta.gov.ua/119/1/Cпірін5_19__10.pdf (in Ukrainian)

Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles (2002). Research-based principles to guide classroom practice Assessment for Learning. Assessment Reform Group.

Baylor, A., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers and Education, 39 (4), 395-414.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.

Earl, L. (2003). Assessment As Learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Experts in Assessment series. Corwin Press, inc., Thousand Oaks, California.

Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms (2005) oecd.org. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/35661078.pdf

Foundations of Teaching for Learning: Introduction to Student Assessment coursera.org. https://www.coursera.org/learn/learning-assessment

Kitsantis, A., Reisner, R. & Doster, J. (2004). Developing self-regulated learners: Goal setting, self-evaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 269-288.

Downloads


Abstract views: 1724

Published

2019-09-24

How to Cite

Morze, N., Vember, V., & Boiko, M. (2019). USING OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT. Electronic Scientific Professional Journal “OPEN EDUCATIONAL E-ENVIRONMENT OF MODERN UNIVERSITY”, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2019s19

Issue

Section

Special Edition “New pedagogical approaches in STEAM education”