MODEL OF STUDENTS’ PROJECT ACTIVITY IN THE DIGITAL SPACE ON THE EXAMPLE OF DISCIPLINES OF THE PEDAGOGICAL CYCLE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2021.1014Keywords:
teacher, distance learning, project activity, students, creative projects, digital learning toolsAbstract
The article presents a model of project activities of applicants for higher education in the context of distance-digital learning using the example of disciplines of the pedagogical training cycle. The analysis of the scientific sources devoted to various aspects of project activity and especially in digital educational space is carried out. The theoretical provisions of the project activities in the digital space are described and the tasks that applicants can perform within this activity are presented. The process of implementation of project activities in the conditions of forced distance learning is highlighted on the example of 2nd year students of the School of Foreign Languages of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University in the 2019/2020 academic year, and attention is focused on the stages of creating and supporting this activity by a lecturer and a student. These stages include: preparatory (communication between applicants and the teacher), operational (project creation), correction (making changes and additions) and final (public defense and registration of the results). The discussion section reveals the prospects and risks of implementing project activities in the digital learning space. The conclusions provide recommendations for the effective organization of project activities in the digital learning space on the example of disciplines of the pedagogical cycle of training: previous preparatory work of the teacher to clarify the requirements for studying the course and organizing project activities (the emphasis here is on group monitors due to the large number of students: an average of 230 people); bright presentation of requirements and previous achievements in creating creative works (projects); defining a clear sequence of actions of this process; explanation of the sequence of actions and communication between the participants of the process teacher-student, teacher-group of students, student-student; support for feedback in consultations, in messengers (with an emphasis on convenience for all parties); current verification of the obtained results, i.e. support and correction of creative works with obligatory explanation of problematic moments for applicants; organization of public defenses of creative works (projects) on proven digital communication platforms; adherence to the principles of academic integrity in the context of distance digital learning through verification of works in generally recognized digital information verification programs; allocation of time for separate consultations for research projects as such, which require special attention due to their complexity; the use of cloud services for recording the results of the progress of applicants and the like.
Downloads
References
Nalyvaiko O., Adzhva D., & Sarhsian E. Distance Education in V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University in 2030, Students’ View. Electronic Scientific Professional Journal “Open Educational e-Environment of Modern University”. 2020. № 9. P. 79-94. URL: https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2020.9.7
Наливайко О., Калістова О., Поляков Д. Дотримання академічної доброчесності навчальних досягнень здобувачів освіти в процесі дистанційного навчання. Освітологічний дискурс. 2020. №31(4). С. 143–162. URL: https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2020.4.10
Barron B. J., Schwartz D. L., Vye N. J., Moore A., Petrosino A., Zech L., & Bransford J. D. Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. Journal of the learning sciences. 1998. № 7(3-4). P. 271-311.
Blumenfeld P. C., Soloway E., Marx R. W., Krajcik J. S., Guzdial M., & Palincsar A. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist. 1991. № 26(3-4). P. 369-398.
Gary K. Project-Based Learning. in Computer. 2015. vol. 48(9). pp. 98-100, doi: 10.1109/MC.2015.268.
Scarbrough H., Swan J., Laurent S., Bresnen M., Edelman L., & Newell S. Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization studies. 2004. № 25(9). P. 1579-1600.
Bagheri M., Ali W. Z. W., Abdullah M. C. B., & Daud S. M. Effects of project-based learning strategy on self-directed learning skills of educational technology students. Contemporary educational technology. 2013. № 4(1). P. 15-29.
Barak, M., & Raz, E. Hot‐air balloons: Project‐centered study as a bridge between science and technology education. Science Education. 2000. № 84(1). P. 27-42.
Hung C. M., Hwang G. J., & Huang I. A project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students' learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2012. № 15(4). P. 368-379.
Lee H. J. Peer evaluation in blended team project-based learning; what do students find important? In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. (2009, October). P. 2838-2842. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Жерновникова О. А., Перетяга Л. Є., Ковтун А. В., Кордубан М. В., Наливайко О. О., Наливайко Н. А. Технологія формування цифрової компетентності майбутніх учителів засобами гейміфікації. Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання. 2020. № 75(1). С. 170-185. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v75i1.3036
Amhag L., Hellström L., & Stigmar M. Teacher educators' use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2019. № 35(4). С. 203-220.
Ardaiz-Villanueva, O., Nicuesa-Chacón, X., Brene-Artazcoz, O., de Acedo Lizarraga, M. L. S., de Acedo Baquedano, M. T. S. Evaluation of computer tools for idea generation and team formation in project-based learning. Computers & Education. 2011. № 56(3). P. 700-711.
Moursund D. Project-based learning using information technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. 1999. 157 p.
Bell S. Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The clearing house. 2010. № 83(2). P. 39-43.
Miglino O., & Walker R. Teaching to teach with technology-a project to encourage take-up of advanced technology in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010. № 2(2). P. 2492-2496. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.359
Raat J. H., & de Vries M. Technology in education: Research and development in the project ‘Physics and Technology’. International Journal of Science Education. 1987. № 9(2). P. 159-168.
Barreda S. V. Analysis of project based learning in a digital environment at a networked high school. JETT. 2016. № 7. P. 27-49.
Boss S., Krauss J. Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. International Society for Technology in Education. 2014.
Claro M., Salinas Á., Cabello-Hutt T., San Martín E., Preiss D. D., Valenzuela S., & Jara I. Teaching in a Digital Environment (TIDE): Defining and measuring teachers' capacity to develop students' digital information and communication skills. Computers & Education. 2018. № 121. P. 162-174.
Ferreira V. G., Canedo E. D. Design sprint in classroom: exploring new active learning tools for project-based learning approach. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2020. № 11(3). P. 1191-1212.
Gómez-Pablos V. B., del Pozo M. M., Muñoz-Repiso A. G. V. Project-based learning (PBL) through the incorporation of digital technologies: An evaluation based on the experience of serving teachers. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. № 68. P. 501-512.
Наливайко О. Stop motion проекти як засіб формування цифрової компететності здобувача освіти. Наукові записки кафедри педагогіки. 2019. №45. С. 13-20. https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8167-2019-45-02