CONNECTIVISM IN DISTANCE LEARNING

Published 2026-04-24

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2026.205

Keywords:

distance learning, connectivism, artificial intelligence, communication, community of practice

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of connectivism as a modern learning theory in the context of digital transformation of education and the impact of generative artificial intelligence on pedagogical communication and professional development of teachers. The theoretical foundation of the study is based on the concepts of George Siemens and Stephen Downes, complemented by the principles of digital pedagogy and the ideas of cognitive partnership between humans and AI.
The paper examines the features of connectivist online courses, particularly the principles of decentralization, self-organization, learner autonomy, openness, and the dynamic nature of the learning environment.
The aim of the study is to determine the potential and mechanisms of influence of connectivist online courses on the development of teachers’ pedagogical competencies and the transformation of communication in the digital environment. The methodology relies on a mixed approach combining quantitative and qualitative methods: analysis of teachers’ activity in LMS Moodle, content analysis of forums and reflections, surveys, observations, and thematic coding of discussions. The research was conducted using the example of the course “E-learning 2023”, which involved teachers from Ukrainian universities.
The results showed that the connectivist course contributes to the formation of communicative, reflective, and ethical competencies, the development of critical thinking and self-regulation among participants. Teachers gradually shift from the role of content consumers to the role of facilitators and knowledge curators, while network interaction becomes a key mechanism of professional growth. The use of generative AI expands the boundaries of connectivism, creating a hybrid educational environment “human – AI – human” and increasing the importance of ethical and critical communication.
The conclusions prove the effectiveness of the connectivist approach for improving teachers’ qualifications and forming communities of practice. Prospects for further research include the development of criteria for assessing the quality of network interaction, modeling the impact of AI on educational communication, and creating experimental AI-connectivist courses of the new generation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm

Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5), Article 2. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol4/iss5/2

Downes, S. (2022). Connectivism. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 58. https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/623

Khatibi, M., & Fouladchang, M. (2015). Connectivism: A review. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2(4). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1da6/18c0e7f97f1f714fd7729b1f980995dff02f.pdf

Duke, B., Harper, G., & Johnston, M. (2013). Connectivism as a digital age learning theory. The International HETL Review, Special Issue. Kaplan University. https://www.hetl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/HETLReview2013SpecialIssueArticle1.pdf

Corneli, J., Danoff, C., Pierce, C., Ricaurte, P., & Snow MacDonald, L. (Eds.). (2016). The peeragogy handbook (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL/Somerville, MA: PubDomEd/Pierce Press. http://peeragogy.org

Chen, L., & Xu, Y. (2022). Theoretical development of connectivism through innovative application in China. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28255

Saadatmand, M. (2017). A new ecology for learning: An online ethnographic study of learners’ participation and experience in connectivist MOOCs. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-NEW-ECOLOGY-FOR-LEARNING-%3A-An-Online-Ethnographic-Saadatmand/7655bbe587cbd32437566ab634163d9653dada7f

Gvozdii, S., Litvinova, A., & Tymchenko, G. (2023). Connectivism Theory in Safety and Health Education in Classical Universities. Educological Discourse, 1(40), 200-223. https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2023.112

Alam, M. (2024). Connectivism and traditional learning theories: Implications for contemporary educational and pedagogical practices. Bhartiyam International Journal of Education & Research, 14(1). https://www.ifwworld.com/gangainstituteofeducation/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/volume-14-issue-december-2.pdf

Dziubaniuk, O., Ivanova-Gongne, M., & Nyholm, M. (2023). Learning and teaching sustainable business in the digital era: A connectivism theory approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00390-w

Alam, A. (2023). Connectivism learning theory and connectivist approach in teaching and learning: A review of literature. Bhartiyam International Journal of Education & Research, 12(2), 1-15.

Taylor, P., & Brown, C. (2024). Blending traditional and connectivist learning theories for higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(2), 102-118.

Kukharenko, V. (2013). Designing massive open online courses. ICTERI. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1000/ICTERI-2013-p-273-280.pdf

Mukhlis, H., Haenilah, E., Sunyono, Maulina, D., Nursafitri, L., Nurfaizal, & Noerhasmalina (2024). Connectivism and digital age education: Insights, challenges, and future directions. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3), 803-814. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/274837

Downloads


Abstract views: 33

How to Cite

Kukharenko, V. (2026). CONNECTIVISM IN DISTANCE LEARNING. Electronic Scientific Professional Journal “OPEN EDUCATIONAL E-ENVIRONMENT OF MODERN UNIVERSITY”, (20), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2026.205

Issue

Section

Статті