THE DIAGNOSTICS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND QUALITOLOGICAL COMPETENCY OF STUDENTS IN HEI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2019s4Keywords:
diagnostics, competence, management activity, qualitative activity, automation of the algorithm, quality of educationAbstract
One of the positive effects of globalization processes is providing international quality of education, promoting the development of information and communication technologies and their dissemination in education. Globalization manifestations of ensuring the quality of education are: training a specialist of innovative type; international mobility of trained labor force; mutual recognition of qualifications by countries in order to enable recruitment of specialists from other countries; rapid response to the development of the modern economy by training specialists of new qualifications with knowledge of new technologies; increasing the number of foreign students; increasing the number of paid-for-study students who consider high-quality education a significant investment; maintenance of the level of competitiveness of the country in the world export market of education. The purpose of the article is to develop methods for diagnosing the formation of education quality management specialists’ managerial and qualitative competence. The criteria for the diagnostics are: motivational-axiological, cognitive, active. The method developed by us involves formal and informal types of theoretical and practical training of educational systems quality specialists. It has been approbated. The quality of the method is statistically confirmed using the Pearson method and single factor analysis dispersion. In the future, the developed methodology for diagnostics of managerial and qualitative competence is proposed to be improved. This improved version is used to identify teachers with a high level of competency. From these teachers, in the future, one can form experts on the quality of education at different levels: local (for institutions of higher education), regional and even national.
Downloads
References
Avanesov, V. С. (2018). Definition, subject and basic functions of pedagogical diagnostics. November 21, 2018.
http://www.ucheba.com/ur_rus/k_metodkopilka/avanesov.htm
Bebyk, V. (2004). Education in a Global Society: Problems and Prospects. The Bologna Process: Prospects and Development in the Context of Ukraine's Integration into the European Higher Education Area. Kyiv, 18-25.
Bitinas, B. P. & Kataeva L. I. (1993). Pedagogical diagnostics: essence, functions, perspectives. Pedagogics, 2.
Efremova, O. V. (2019). Pedagogical diagnostics in the system of quality assurance training for a future specialist. June 15, 2019. http://www.stattionline.org.ua/pedagog/104/17755-pedagogichna-diagnostika-v-sistemi-zabezpechennya-yakosti-pidgotovki-faxivciv.html
Kondur, O.S. (2018). The management of quality of educational systems in the conditions of globalization: theory, methods of organization, practice. Ivano-Frankivsk: NAIR. 488 p.
Mykhaylyshyn, G. & Kondur, O. (2019). The pedagogical modeling of professional training of managers from quality of education. Educational Space of Ukraine, 15, 96-104.
Podlasy, I. P. (1999). Pedagogy New course. In 2 books. Мoskow: Vlados; book 1. 576 p.; book 2, 256 р.
Internation standard organization. ISO 9000 – Quality management systems. Fundamentals and vocabulary (2005). Brusel: CEN.
Hrnčiar, M., Madzík, P. (2013). Improving the Quality of Higher Education in Central Europe: Approach Based On GAP Analysis. Higher Education Studies, 3 (4). DOI: 10.5539/hes.v3n4p75. June 14, 2019.
Orsingher, C. H. (2006). Assessing Quality in European Higher Education Institutions. New York: Physica-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1688-4.