COMPONENTS OF READINESS OF FUTURE TEACHERS OF NATURAL MATHEMATICAL DISCIPLINES TO THE APPLICATION OF VISUALIZATION TECHNOLOGIES IN SUBJECT-PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY

Abstract

The article highlights the components of the future teacher of natural and mathematical subjects' readiness for the use of visualization technologies in the educational process of the secondary school (motivational-value, cognitive, operational-activity, practical-activity, reflexive-evaluation). According to the components outlined, criteria are set and indicators through which the relevant criteria are reflected. Indicators of motivational value criterion include the desire to: realize the importance of using visualization technologies in the educational process; overcoming difficulties and volitional efforts in the process of introducing visualization technologies in the educational process; interest in acquiring knowledge, skills and skills in mastering new tools of visualization technologies and mastering new forms of learning using these technologies; display of creativity in solving professional problems. The cognitive criterion is represented by indicators of knowledge: psychological and age characteristics of pupils' perception of visual materials; didactic potential of imaging technologies; methods and rules of structuring, compaction and principles of distribution of educational material; the basics of design (rules and techniques of composition and color); classification of online visualization tools for use in the learning process; the system of requirements that the visualization used in the educational process must meet. The indicators of the operational-instrumental criterion include the following skills: effective presentation of educational material by creating cognitive visual anchors and visual metaphors; store received and processed visual information in an appropriate form; to transmit information for collective use in a clear visual way and in different visual formats; create your own visuals; apply a system of requirements for the creation of visual content; possess a wide range of tools. The practical-activity criterion is represented by the ability to: use visualization technologies in the process of lesson design, to adapt the ready didactic visual aids to the content and purpose of the lesson, the contingent of students; create objective tasks on ready-made visual materials, etc .; to justify the pedagogical expediency of using visualization technologies in the lesson; organize educational, research, reflexive and other activities of students with their use; to provide students with assistance appropriate to their needs. The last criterion is a reflexive evaluation, which requires a critical assessment of: the feasibility of forms and methods of teaching based on visualization technologies for their use in the educational process; the quality of their own preparation for the use of visualization technologies in the educational process and identifying ways to improve this training; monitoring of new methods and tools for creating visual materials; systematic correction of their own preparation for the use of visualization technologies in subject learning.